Writer’s workshop vs writing prompts
This study explores how picture books used as mentor texts can improve secondary students' writing. Find out what the research says about word choice, sentence fluency, and grammar across ability levels.
Carroll, S., & Feng, J. (2010, October). Writer’s workshop vs writing prompts: The effect on first graders’ writing ability and attitude towards writing. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the Georgia Educational Research Association, Savannah, GA. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED533063
Background
Writer’s Workshop and Prompted Writing are two different approaches to the teaching of writing. In Writer’s Workshop, students self-select topics to write about. In Prompted Writing, teachers select written or visual prompts to prime students to write about specific topics for specific types of texts. This study aimed to investigate which of the two types of instruction was better, given that prompts are used to examine students in state-wide examinations.
Aims
The purpose of this study was to determine if picture books could enhance word choice, sentence fluency and conventions in narrative writing when used with 10th Grade struggling writers.
Sample
Twelve participants were selected from two low achieving 10th grade English classes at a suburban high school. The researchers made their selection based on the overall command of English and coherency of the students in completing a writing prompt. The 12 included the four highest, lowest, and average-performing students based on responses to the given prompt. All students participated in the subsequent class activities but only the data from the two sets of 12 were analysed.
Method
Over an 11-week period, the teacher read 12 picture books and discussed three aspects: word choice, sentence fluency and correct grammar. Students worked on a piece of writing or revised a draft, focussing on the three aspects. The teacher also used examples from his own writing to model how students could revise their writing to include the trait they noticed in the picture books. Four data sources were used in this study: multiple drafts of student writing, student reflections, students’ scores and entries in the teacher’s reflective journals.
Findings
The study found that picture books as mentor texts can enhance secondary student writing regardless of ability level and engagement. Although students took longer to understand sentence fluency compared to correct grammar, student growth was most evident in this aspect.
Implications
The use of picture books as mentor texts, together with teacher modelling, has a place in both primary and secondary schools regardless of student ability.
Original article retrieved from EBSCOHost.
